Prostate Cancer - Staging (part5)

Posted by Pharmaceutical-Stuff on Tuesday 4 March 2008

The 2002 TNM staging system is used to stage , as follows:

T - Primary tumor
TX - Primary tumor cannot be assessed
T0 - No evidence of primary tumor
T1 - Clinically inapparent tumor not palpable or visible by imaging
T1a - Tumor incidental histologic finding in less than or equal to 5% of tissue resected
T1b - Tumor incidental histologic finding in greater than 5% of tissue resected
T1c - Tumor identified by needle biopsy (because of elevated level); tumors found in 1 or both lobes by needle biopsy but not palpable or reliably visible by imaging
T2 - Tumor confined within
T2a - Tumor involving less than half a lobe
T2b - Tumor involving less than or equal to 1 lobe
T2c - Tumor involving both lobes
T3 - Tumor extending through the prostatic capsule; no invasion into the prostatic apex or into, but not beyond, the prostatic capsule
T3a - Extracapsular extension (unilateral or bilateral)
T3b - Tumor invading seminal vesicle(s)
T4 - Tumor fixed or invading adjacent structures other than seminal vesicles (eg, bladder neck, external sphincter, rectum, levator muscles, pelvic wall)
NX - Regional nodes (cannot be assessed)
N0 - No regional node metastasis
N1 - Metastasis in regional node or nodes

Regional nodes are assessed by removal or biopsy of the pelvic nodes, including the obturator chain. The boundaries are the bifurcation of the common iliac, the obturator nerve, and the node of .

Distant metastasis:
PM1c - More than 1 site of metastasis present
MX - Distant metastasis cannot be assessed
M0 - No distant metastasis
M1 - Distant metastasis
M1a - Nonregional node(s)
M1b - Bone(s)
M1c - Other site(s)

Tags: , , ,

Related posts

Posted in Cancer | Comment

Prostate Cancer - Screening (part4)

Posted by Pharmaceutical-Stuff on Sunday 2 March 2008

and are the 2 components necessary for a modern screening program. Transrectal ultrasound () has been associated with a high false-positive rate, making it unsuitable as a screening tool, although it is very useful for directing prostatic biopsies.

The indications for screening are controversial. The American Society recommendations are as follows:
Both specific antigen () and digital rectal examination () should be offered annually, beginning at age 50 years, to men who have at least a 10-year life expectancy and to younger men who are at high risk. Information should be provided to patients regarding potential risks and benefits of intervention.

Advocates of screening believe that detection is crucial in order to find organ-confined and, thereby, impact mortality. If patients wait for symptoms or even positive , less than half have organ-confined . Those who do not advocate screening worry that screening will detect some cancers that are not organ confined or that it may find cancers that are not biologically significant. Currently, age-specific cutoffs are used to guide screening. The trend is toward lowering the threshold level to 2.5 ng/dL, but this has not been widely accepted as yet.

Men who choose to undergo screening should begin at age 50 years. Men in high-risk groups, such as those with a strong familial predisposition (2 or more first-degree relatives are affected) and those of African American race, should begin screening at a younger age (40-45 y). These men are less likely to have the latent form of the and benefit from treatment. More data on the precise age to start screening are needed for men at high risk.

Recent data from Canadian and Austrian studies suggest that mortality rates are lower as a result of screening. Canadian data have shown that from 1989-1996, the mortality rate was lower in the -screened cohort than the control group. Recent studies from Tyrol, Austria also show a beneficial result for screening in reducing -specific mortality. These beneficial effects are likely due to the fact that treatment rather than observation may enhance -specific survival. This was recently shown in a 2002 Scandinavian study that reported significantly reduced -specific mortality for radical patients when compared with watchful waiting. No difference in overall survival was noted. Currently, US data have shown a decrease in mortality of 1% per year since 1990, which coincides with the advent of screening. Other theories have been proposed to account for the decrease, and these include changing treatment practices and artifacts in mortality rates secondary to the changing incidence.

Abnormal rectal examination findings
Findings from the are crucial. An irregular, firm or nodule is typical, but many cancers are found in prostates that feel normal. Pay careful attention to the consistency, along with the seminal vesicles and adjacent organs, to detect spread of the to these structures.

Overdistended bladder due to outlet obstruction

  • Neurologic findings secondary to cord compression: Other subtle findings, such as paresthesias or wasting, are uncommon.
  • Lower extremity lymphedema
  • Supraclavicular adenopathy
  • Lower extremity deep venous thrombosis
  • cachexia

Transrectal ultrasound
is used to examine the for hypoechoic areas, which are commonly associated with cancers but are not specific enough for diagnostic purposes. At least 6 or, more recently, 10 or more systematic biopsy specimens of peripheral and, occasionally, transitional zones are taken under ultrasound guidance. Samples should include most areas of the gland, irrespective of ultrasonographic abnormalities.

Differential diagnosis
Benign prostatic hypertrophy
Calculi
Prostatic cysts
Prostatic tuberculosis
Prostatitis

© Dan Theodorescu
© Tracey L Krupski

Tags: , , , , ,

Related posts

Posted in Cancer | Comment

Prostate Cancer - Etiology (part2)

Posted by Pharmaceutical-Stuff on Friday 29 February 2008

Genetics
Alteration of genes on 1, 17, and the X have been found in some patients with a family history of . The hereditary 1 (HPC1) gene and the predisposing for of the (PCAP) gene are on 1, while the human gene is on the X . In addition, genetic studies suggest that a strong familial predisposition may be responsible for as many as 5-10% of cases. Recently, several reports have suggested a shared familial risk (inherited or environmental) for and breast . Men with a family history of have a higher risk of developing and are also likely to present 6-7 years earlier.

Race
African American men have a higher prevalence and more aggressive than white men, who, in turn, have a higher prevalence than men of Asian origin. Studies have found that young African American men have levels 15% higher than young white men. Furthermore, evidence indicates that 5-alpha reductase may be more active in African Americans than in whites, implying that hormonal differences may play a role. The independent contribution of race alone is difficult to qualify when the effects of health care access, income, education, and insurance status are also considered.

Diet
A high-fat diet may lead to increased risks, while a diet rich in soy may be protective. These observations have been proposed as reasons for the low prevalence of this in Asia. Japanese American men have rates of much greater than those of native Japanese men, supporting the association of a high-fat diet with . Cell culture studies have shown that omega-6 fatty acids are positive stimulants of cell growth, while omega-3 fatty acids are negative stimuli. These fats may exert their effects by alterations of or growth factors or through effects on 5-alpha reductase.

Soy seems to decrease the growth of cells in mouse models; however, apart from epidemiologic factors, no direct evidence supports a beneficial effect for humans. may have some protective effects because it is an antioxidant. Decreased levels of vitamin A may be a risk factor because this can promote cell differentiation and stimulate the immune system. deficiency was suggested as a risk factor, and studies show an inverse relationship between ultraviolet exposure and mortality rates for . However, a specific correlation between 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D levels and palpable , well-differentiated tumors, or mortality is inconclusive.

Selenium may have a protective effect based on epidemiologic studies, and it is also believed to extend its effect via its antioxidant properties. SELECT, the Selenium and Prevention Trial, is an ongoing intergroup, phase 3, randomized, controlled trial designed to test the efficacy of selenium and alone and in combination in the prevention of .

Hormones
Hormonal causes have also been postulated because androgen ablation causes regression of cancers, and eunuchs do not develop adenocarcinoma of the . Data implicating hormonal causes are indirect evidence, such as that pertaining to eunuchs.

Hsing and Comstock performed a large study comparing patients with with controls and found no difference in , dihydrotestosterone, prolactin, follicle-stimulating hormone, or estrone.

The Prevention Trial studied the prevalence of between a control group and a group given a 5-alpha reductase inhibitor. While the 5-alpha reductase inhibitor appeared to decrease the prevalence of tumors, those that did arise appeared histologically more aggressive. Only long-term follow-up of these patients will determine whether this more aggressive histology accurately reflects the underlying biology of these tumors or whether it is an artifact of the treatment.

Tags: , , , , ,

Related posts

Posted in Cancer | Comment

Prostate Cancer - Introduction (part1)

Posted by Pharmaceutical-Stuff on Wednesday 27 February 2008

is the most common noncutaneous among males. Lung and bronchial account for 37% of male deaths, and and colon account for another 10% each. The diagnosis and treatment of continue to evolve. With the development of -specific antigen () screening, more men are identified earlier as having . While can be a slow-growing , thousands of men die of the each year. Education is important to help men understand the risk of progression and the various treatment options. This article provides a current overview of the biology, pathology, diagnostic techniques, natural history, and screening for this disorder.

Incidental findings
In the modern era, most patients present because of abnormalities in a screening level or digital rectal examination () and not because of symptoms (see -Specific Antigen). However, can be an incidental pathologic finding when tissue is removed at the time of transurethral resection for obstructive prostatic symptoms.

Elevated level
is a single-chain glycoprotein that has chymotrypsinlike properties. slowly hydrolyzes peptide bonds, thereby liquifying semen. The upper limit of normal for is 4 ng/mL. Some advocate age-related cutoffs, such as 2.5 ng/mL for the fifth decade of life, 3.5 ng/mL for the sixth decade of life, and 4.5 ng/mL for the seventh decade of life. Others advocate race-specific reference ranges. Using recent data from screening studies, some have advocated upper limits of normal of 2.5 ng/mL instead of 4 ng/mL.

Percent of free
A recent development, the measurement of bound and free can help discriminate between patients with mildly elevated levels from and those with benign prostatic hyperplasia. The lower the ratio of free-to-total , the higher the likelihood of . Free is reported as a percent. Using 25% as the cutoff, 95% of cancers can be detected in both African Americans and whites. A cutoff of 22% maximizes detection and minimizes unnecessary biopsies. Generally, these percents are useful in patients who have a level in the range of 4-10 ng/mL.

This information is most useful in men with very large glands or in men who have already had one negative biopsy result. If the man is healthy and has a level of 4-10 ng/mL, many recommend biopsy directly, without the additional free- test, or consider a trial of antibiotic therapy for 4-6 weeks before repeating the test. If antibiotic therapy lowers the to normal levels in a short time, is less likely to have caused the prior elevation, and the test should be repeated in a few months.

Abnormal findings
Various factors are taken into consideration when performing a . A nodule is important, but findings such as asymmetry, difference in texture, and bogginess are important clues to the patient’s condition and should be considered in conjunction with the level. Change in texture over time can offer important clues about the need for intervention. Cysts or stones cannot be accurately differentiated from based on findings alone; therefore, maintain a high index of suspicion if the are abnormal. In addition, if is detected, the findings form the basis of clinical staging of the primary tumor (ie, T stage in the TNM staging system). In current practice, most patients diagnosed with have normal but abnormal readings.

Local symptoms
In the pre- era, patients with commonly presented with local symptoms. Urinary retention occurred in 20-25%, back or leg pain occurred in 20-40%, and hematuria occurred in 10-15%. Currently, with screening, patients report urinary frequency (38%), decreased urine stream (23%), urinary urgency (10%), and hematuria (1.4%). However, none of these complaints is unique to and each could arise from a variety of other ailments. Forty-seven percent of patients are asymptomatic.

symptoms
symptoms include weight loss and loss of appetite; bone pain, with or without pathologic fracture (because , when , has a strong predilection for bone); and lower extremity pain and edema from nodal metastasis obstructing venous and lymphatic tributaries. Uremic symptoms can occur from ureteral obstruction caused by local growth or retroperitoneal adenopathy secondary to nodal metastasis.

Frequency
With the advent of screening, a greater number of men require education about and how it is diagnosed, staged, and treated in order to select the most appropriate treatment.

According to recent figures from the American Society, 220,900 new cases were diagnosed in 2003 and 28,900 men will die of . is rarely diagnosed in men younger than 40 years, and it is uncommon in men younger than 50 years.

Prevalence rates of remain significantly higher in African American men than in white men, while the prevalence in Hispanic men is similar to that of non-Hispanic white men. Hispanic men and African American men present with more advanced , most likely related to external (eg, income, education, insurance status) and cultural factors. In addition, African American men generally have higher levels of , which may contribute to the higher incidence of carcinoma.

Between 1989 and 1992, incidence rates of increased dramatically, probably because of earlier diagnoses in asymptomatic men as a result of the increased use of serum testing. In fact, the incidence of organ-confined at diagnosis has increased because both testing and standard are performed. incidence rates are currently declining, with peak rates in 1992 among white men and in 1993 among African American men.

During 1992-1996, mortality rates for declined significantly, approximately 2.5% per year . Although mortality rates are continuing to decline among white and African American men, mortality rates in African American men remain 2.3 times as high as rates in white men based on 2003 American Society projections.

is also found during autopsies performed following other causes of death. The rate of this latent or autopsy is much greater than that of clinical . In fact, it may be as high as 80% by age 80 years.

The prevalence of clinical varies regionally, and these differences may be due to some of the genetic, hormonal, and dietary factors discussed in the next section. High rates are reported in northern Europe and North America, intermediate rates are reported in southern Europe and Central and South America, and low rates are reported in eastern Europe and Asia.

Interestingly, the prevalence of the latent or autopsy form of the is similar worldwide. Together with migration studies, this suggests that environmental factors, such as diet, may play a significant promoting role in the development of a clinical from a latent precursor.

© Emedicine.com

Tags: , , ,

Related posts

Posted in Cancer | Comment