Archive for March, 2008

BOTOX® Injections

Posted by Pharmaceutical-Stuff on Wednesday 12 March 2008

Botulinum is produced by the gram-negative anaerobic bacterium Clostridium botulinum.

Eight serologically distinct botulinum neurotoxins exist, designated as A, B, C1, C2, D, E, F, and G. Seven are associated with paralysis. Types A, B, E and, rarely, F and G are associated with human botulism.

Botulism is a bilaterally symmetric descending neuroparalytic illness caused by botulinum . The German physician and poet Justinus Kerner published the first full description of clinical symptoms of food-borne botulism from 1817-1822. His observations followed an increase in food poisoning in Stuttgart from 1795-1813 caused by general economic hardship related to the Napoleonic wars and a decline in hygienic measures of food production and handling. The illness became known as “sausage poisoning” because it was observed to follow ingestion of spoiled sausage. The word botulism comes from the Latin botulus, meaning sausage.

Kerner deduced that the toxin acts by interrupting signal transmission within the peripheral and sympathetic nervous system, leaving sensory transmission intact. He also hypothesized possible therapeutic uses of the sausage toxin. In 1895, the microbiologist Emile-Pierre van Ermengen discovered the association with an anaerobic bacterium during an outbreak of botulism following a funeral ceremony in the Belgian village of Ellezelles.

When foods tainted with are ingested, the is absorbed and spread hematogenously to peripheral cholinergic nerve terminals, where it blocks the release of acetylcholine. The is heat labile and denatured by cooking. Sporadic outbreaks of botulism in the United States occur after ingestion of home-canned foods, meat products, and preserved fish. The incubation period following ingestion is 18-36 hours.

In contrast, infant botulism is caused by colonization of the gut by C botulinum, and subsequent production and absorption leads to absorption of the toxin. Honey consumption has been implicated in infant botulism, and microbiologic surveys have identified clostridial spores (mostly type B) in up to 25% of honey products.

Wound botulism may occur if the organism infects a wound and produces the toxin. The clinical syndrome of botulism is one of progressive muscle weakness, often beginning in the extraocular or pharyngeal muscles and becoming generalized. GI tract complaints may be prominent. Dilated unreactive pupils are common, and mucous membranes are often dry and erythematous. No sensory signs are associated, and alertness is maintained as long as respiration is adequate.

In 1946, Schantz helped isolate botulinum toxin type A in crystalline form. In the 1970s, Scott experimented with botulinum toxin type A in monkeys for the treatment of strabismus. In 1977-1978, he performed trials in patients with strabismus. In the mid 1980s, he treated an individual with botulinum toxin for cosmetic reasons. Carruthers, Carruthers, Brin, and the Columbia University group noticed cosmetic improvement following botulinum toxin injection for facial dystonias and began pursuing this line of investigation in the late 1980s and 1990s.

Botulinum toxins currently are used to treat a variety of disorders including strabismus, hemifacial spasms, focal dystonias (eg, blepharospasm, torticollis, spasmodic dysphonia, limb dystonia, writer’s cramp), spasticity, tremor, tics, synkinesis, hyperhidrosis, achalasia, and sphincter dysfunction. They are being evaluated to treat headaches and pain syndromes. ® (botulinum toxin type A) currently is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of blepharospasm and strabismus associated with dystonias, including benign essential blepharospasm or cranial nerve VII disorders in patients aged 12 years or older, and for the treatment of cervical dystonia in adults. Myobloc (botulinum toxin type B) is currently FDA approved for the treatment of cervical dystonia. Injection of botulinum toxins for cosmesis currently is considered off-label use but constitutes their most prevalent use.

Mechanism of action
Botulinum toxins block acetylcholine release, causing a chemical denervation. Neurotransmission at the neuromuscular junction involves the release of acetylcholine from the presynaptic nerve terminal. Acetylcholine release requires docking and binding of the neurotransmitter vesicles to the presynaptic membrane.

Several different proteins mediate this process. N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein (NSF) is a cytoplasmic protein that is part of the fusion complex. Soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion–attachment proteins (SNAPs) are found in the cytoplasm and serve as attachment and stabilizing proteins for the NSF complex. SNAP receptors (SNAREs) are found on the vesicle and plasma membranes. SNAREs include vesicle-associated membrane protein (VAMP/synaptobrevin) and the plasma proteins SNAP-25 and syntaxin.

Botulinum toxin is a zinc-dependent endopeptidase made up of a light (50 kilodaltons [kDa]) and a heavy (100 kDa) chain linked by disulfide bonds.

The mechanism of action includes the following 4 key steps (see Image):

BOTOX® Injections

  • The first step is binding of the toxin to specific receptors on the surface of the presynaptic cell surface, mediated by the C-terminal half of the heavy chain. This step occurs over approximately 30 minutes.
  • The second step is internalization, an energy-dependent receptor-mediated endocytic process. In this step, the plasma membrane of the nerve cell invaginates around the toxin-receptor complex, forming a toxin-containing vesicle inside the nerve terminal.
  • The third step is translocation. After internalization, the disulfide bond is cleaved, and the 50-kDa light chain of the toxin molecule is released across the endosomal membrane of the endocytic vesicle into the cytoplasm of the nerve terminal.
  • The final step is blocking. The 50-kDa light chain of serotypes A and E inhibit acetylcholine release by cleaving a cytoplasmic protein (SNAP-25) required for the docking of acetylcholine vesicles on the inner side of the nerve terminal plasma membrane. Botulinum toxin type D is specific for VAMP/synaptobrevin. Botulinum toxin types B and F also affect the VAMP/synaptobrevin protein. These actions impede the release of acetylcholine into the synaptic cleft.

The clinical effect of botulinum toxin injections lasts 2-6 months and then resolves. Once chemical denervation begins, axon terminals form new unmyelinated sprouts, and the motor endplate regions expand (see Image).

BOTOX® Injections

After several months, the inactivated terminals slowly recover function, and the new sprouts and end plates regress. Recovery of inactivated terminals appears to be the basis of the loss of clinical effect several months after injection.

Tags: ,

Related posts

Prostate Cancer Resource Books

Posted by Pharmaceutical-Stuff on Monday 10 March 2008

:

Here is a list of books that contain informations on , i know its such a big list but i had to cover any aspects of the , so this list will include absolute everything, you can start reading.

  1. Albertsen PC, Fryback DG, Storer BE, et al: The impact of co-morbidity on life expectancy among men with localized . J Urol 1996 Jul; 156(1): 127-32[Medline].
  2. Albertsen PC, Fryback DG, Storer BE, et al: Long-term survival among men with conservatively treated localized . JAMA 1995 Aug 23-30; 274(8): 626-31[Medline].
  3. Amling CL, Kane CJ, Riffenburgh RH, et al: Relationship between obesity and race in predicting adverse pathologic variables in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Urology 2001 Nov; 58(5): 723-8[Medline].
  4. Berthon P, Valeri A, Cohen-Akenine A, et al: Predisposing gene for -onset , localized on chromosome 1q42.2-43. Am J Hum Genet 1998 Jun; 62(6): 1416-24[Medline].
  5. Bostwick DG: Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN): current concepts. J Cell Biochem Suppl 1992; 16H: 10-9[Medline].
  6. Bostwick DG, Qian J: High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Mod Pathol 2004 Mar; 17(3): 360-79[Medline].
  7. Bratt O, Kristoffersson U, Lundgren R, Olsson H: Familial and hereditary in southern Sweden. A population-based case-control study. Eur J 1999 Feb; 35(2): 272-7[Medline].
  8. Carter BS, Bova GS, Beaty TH, et al: Hereditary : epidemiologic and clinical features. J Urol 1993 Sep; 150(3): 797-802[Medline].
  9. Carter HB, Epstein JI, Chan DW, et al: Recommended -specific antigen testing intervals for the detection of curable . JAMA 1997 May 14; 277(18): 1456-60[Medline].
  10. Catalona WJ, Smith DS, Ornstein DK: detection in men with serum PSA concentrations of 2.6 to 4.0 ng/mL and benign examination. Enhancement of specificity with free PSA measurements. JAMA 1997 May 14; 277(18): 1452-5[Medline].
  11. Chodak GW, Thisted RA, Gerber GS, et al: of conservative management of clinically localized . N Engl J Med 1994 Jan 27; 330(4): 242-8[Medline].
  12. Djavan B, Susani M, Bursa B, et al: Predictability and significance of multifocal in the radical prostatectomy specimen. Tech Urol 1999 Sep; 5(3): 139-42[Medline].
  13. Etzioni R, Legler JM, Feuer EJ, et al: surveillance series: interpreting trends in –part III: Quantifying the link between population -specific antigen testing and recent declines in mortality. J Natl Inst 1999 Jun 16; 91(12): 1033-9[Medline].
  14. Feuer EJ, Merrill RM, Hankey BF: surveillance series: interpreting trends in –part II: Cause of death misclassification and the recent rise and fall in mortality. J Natl Inst 1999 Jun 16; 91(12): 1025-32[Medline].
  15. Gleason DF: Histologic grading of : a perspective. Hum Pathol 1992 Mar; 23(3): 273-9[Medline].
  16. Graversen PH, Nielsen KT, Gasser TC, et al: Radical prostatectomy versus expectant primary treatment in stages I and II prostatic . A fifteen-year follow-up. Urology 1990 Dec; 36(6): 493-8[Medline].
  17. Greene FL, Sobin LH: The TNM system: our language for care. J Surg Oncol 2002 Jul; 80(3): 119-20[Medline].
  18. Hoffman RM, Gilliland FD, Eley JW, et al: Racial and ethnic differences in advanced-stage : the Outcomes Study. J Natl Inst 2001 Mar 7; 93(5): 388-95[Medline].
  19. Holmberg L, Bill-Axelson A, Helgesen F, et al: A randomized trial comparing radical prostatectomy with watchful waiting in . N Engl J Med 2002 Sep 12; 347(11): 781-9[Medline].
  20. Hsing AW, Tsao L, Devesa SS: International trends and patterns of incidence and mortality. Int J 2000 Jan 1; 85(1): 60-7[Medline].
  21. Hsing AW, Comstock GW: Serological precursors of : serum hormones and risk of subsequent . Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1993 Jan-Feb; 2(1): 27-32[Medline].
  22. Iczkowski KA, Chen HM, Yang XJ, Beach RA: diagnosed after initial biopsy with atypical small acinar proliferation suspicious for malignancy is similar to found on initial biopsy. Urology 2002 Nov; 60(5): 851-4[Medline].
  23. Iczkowski KA, Bassler TJ, Schwob VS, et al: Diagnosis of “suspicious for malignancy” in biopsies: predictive value for . Urology 1998 May; 51(5): 749-57; discussion 757-8[Medline].
  24. Jemal A, Murray T, Samuels A, et al: statistics, 2003. CA J Clin 2003 Jan-Feb; 53(1): 5-26[Medline].
  25. Johansson JE, Andrén O, Andersson SO, et al: Natural history of , localized . JAMA 2004 Jun 9; 291(22): 2713-9[Medline].
  26. Klein EA, Thompson IM, Lippman SM, et al: SELECT: the Selenium and Vitamin E Prevention Trial: rationale and design. Prostatic Dis 2000 Nov; 3(3): 145-151[Medline].
  27. Kolonel LN, Nomura AM, Cooney RV: Dietary fat and : current status. J Natl Inst 1999 Mar 3; 91(5): 414-28[Medline].
  28. Labrie F, Candas B, Dupont A, et al: Screening decreases death: first analysis of the 1988 Quebec prospective randomized controlled trial. 1999 Feb 1; 38(2): 83-91[Medline].
  29. Langer JE, Rovner ES, Coleman BG, et al: Strategy for repeat biopsy of patients with prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia detected by needle biopsy. J Urol 1996 Jan; 155(1): 228-31[Medline].
  30. Lee F, Siders DB, Torp-Pedersen ST, et al: : transrectal ultrasound and pathology comparison. A preliminary study of outer gland (peripheral and central zones) and inner gland (transition zone) . 1991 Feb 15; 67(4 Suppl): 1132-42[Medline].
  31. McCahy PJ, Harris CA, Neal DE: Breast and in the relatives of men with . Br J Urol 1996 Oct; 78(4): 552-6[Medline].
  32. Morgan TO, Jacobsen SJ, McCarthy WF, et al: Age-specific reference ranges for -specific antigen in black men. N Engl J Med 1996 Aug 1; 335(5): 304-10[Medline].
  33. Moyad MA: Soy, disease prevention, and . Semin Urol Oncol 1999 May; 17(2): 97-102[Medline].
  34. Ndubuisi SC, Kofie VY, Andoh JY, Schwartz FM: Black-white differences in the stage at presentation of in the District of Columbia. Urology 1995 Jul; 46(1): 71-7[Medline].
  35. Punglia RS, D’Amico AV, Catalona WJ, et al: Effect of verification bias on screening for by measurement of -specific antigen. N Engl J Med 2003 Jul 24; 349(4): 335-42[Medline].
  36. Rodríguez C, Calle EE, Tatham LM, et al: Family history of breast as a predictor for fatal . Epidemiology 1998 Sep; 9(5): 525-9[Medline].
  37. Ruijter ET, Miller GJ, van de Kaa CA, et al: Molecular analysis of multifocal lesions. J Pathol 1999 Jul; 188(3): 271-7[Medline].
  38. Sellers TA, Potter JD, Rich SS, et al: Familial clustering of breast and cancers and risk of postmenopausal breast . J Natl Inst 1994 Dec 21; 86(24): 1860-5[Medline].
  39. Smith JR, Freije D, Carpten JD, et al: Major susceptibility locus for on chromosome 1 suggested by a genome-wide search. Science 1996 Nov 22; 274(5291): 1371-4[Medline].
  40. Stemmermann GN, Nomura AM, Chyou PH, Yatani R: A prospective comparison of at autopsy and as a clinical event: the Hawaii Japanese experience. Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1992 Mar-Apr; 1(3): 189-93[Medline].
  41. Theodorescu D, Broder SR, Boyd JC, et al: p53, bcl-2 and retinoblastoma proteins as long-term prognostic markers in localized carcinoma of the . J Urol 1997 Jul; 158(1): 131-7[Medline].
  42. Theodorescu D, Frierson HF, Sikes RA: Molecular determination of surgical margins using fossa biopsies at radical prostatectomy. J Urol 1999 May; 161(5): 1442-8[Medline].
  43. Thompson IM, Goodman PJ, Tangen CM, et al: The influence of finasteride on the development of . N Engl J Med 2003 Jul 17; 349(3): 215-24[Medline].
  44. Walsh PC, Vaughan ED, Retik AB, Wein A, eds: Campbell’s Urology. Vol 3. 7th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1998: 2487-656.
  45. Weinrich MC, Jacobsen SJ, Weinrich SP, et al: Reference ranges for serum -specific antigen in black and white men without . Urology 1998 Dec; 52(6): 967-73[Medline].
  46. Whitmore WF Jr: Expectant management of clinically localized prostatic . Semin Oncol 1994 Oct; 21(5): 560-8[Medline].
  47. Xu J, Meyers D, Freije D, et al: Evidence for a susceptibility locus on the X chromosome. Nat Genet 1998 Oct; 20(2): 175-9[Medline].
  48. Yatani R, Shiraishi T, Nakakuki K, et al: Trends in frequency of latent carcinoma in Japan from 1965-1979 to 1982-1986. J Natl Inst 1988 Jul 6; 80(9): 683-7[Medline].
  49. Zimmerman SM: Factors influencing Hispanic participation in screening. Oncol Nurs Forum 1997 Apr; 24(3): 499-504[Medline].

Tags: , ,

Related posts

Pancreatic Cancer Symptoms

Posted by Pharmaceutical-Stuff on Saturday 8 March 2008

Symptoms:

The main symptoms of include the following:

  • Pain in the abdomen, the back, or both
  • Weight loss, often associated with the following:
  • Loss of appetite (anorexia)
  • Bloating
  • Diarrhea or fatty bowel movements that float in water (steatorrhea)
  • Rarely may present with new diabetes in a person with weight loss and nausea
  • Jaundice (yellowing of the skin)

The symptoms of are generally vague and can easily be attributed to other less serious and more common conditions. This lack of specific symptoms explains the high number of people who have a more advanced stage of disease when is discovered.

Symptoms

Tags: ,

Related posts

Posted in Cancer | Comment

Pancreatic Cancer Treatments

Posted by Pharmaceutical-Stuff on Friday 7 March 2008

Pancreatic Cancer TreatmentsThe pancreas is a comma-shaped organ about six inches long that is situated horizontally behind the stomach. The duct joins the lower end of the bile duct and both ducts drain into the small intestine. The pancreas secretes enzymes that aid digestion and the production of insulin. Insulin regulates sugar metabolism. The pancreas connects through the bile ducts to the small intestine.
Surgery

Surgeons typically recommend surgery for tumors contained in the pancreas. The specific operation depends upon whether the tumor is located in the head, neck, body or tail of the pancreas. In general, tumors located in the head and neck area of the pancreas are managed with the Whipple resection, whereas those in the body and tail are managed with the distal pancreatectomy. Occasionally, a total pancreatectomy is required, though it is used less commonly. Occasionally, portal vein removal may be possible.
Radiation Therapy

Radiation therapy is usually recommended for patients who have localized cancers that cannot be removed. It is also generally recommended either following surgical removal of the tumor or before an attempt at removal. High-dose radiation can be directed toward the pancreas to destroy cells and reduce a tumor’s size. Most commonly, radiation is delivered from a source outside of the body, usually with high-energy linear accelerators. Sometimes radiation therapy may be delivered with electrons during surgery. Radiation oncologists have developed 3-dimensional conformal techniques that deliver radiation to the area of the pancreas and lymph node sites at risk while protecting important organs such as the kidneys, spinal cord and liver.

Sometimes radiation therapy may be delivered with electrons during surgery in a process called intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT). IORT may be an option for patients in whom the appears to be borderline resectable or unresectable based on images of the tumor. In such instances, the physician team may determine that the external radiation plus chemotherapy component of treatment should be given before surgery to remove the . At the time of subsequent surgery (usually 4-6 weeks after completion of combined chemoradiation), IORT can be delivered to a site of narrow resection margins or to unresectable , as needed.

Specialists typically use radiation in combination with other therapies such as chemotherapy. Clinical trials investigating the best combinations of drugs with radiation therapy are available. Clinical trials may offer the best treatment options for some patients.
Chemotherapy

Chemotherapy can be administered orally or through a vein into the blood stream. Oncologists usually recommend chemotherapy to treat that has spread to other parts of the body. It can be combined with other therapies, and physicians usually recommend it for patients who receive radiation therapy. Chemotherapy is given during radiation to enhance the local effects of radiation, and additional cycles of chemotherapy are given after the combined chemoradiation in an attempt to prevent spread of the elsewhere in the body.

Tags: ,

Related posts

Posted in Cancer | Comment

Pancreatic Cancer

Posted by Pharmaceutical-Stuff on Thursday 6 March 2008

Info:

is one of the most serious of cancers. It develops when cancerous cells form in the tissues of your pancreas — a large organ that lies horizontally behind the lower part of your stomach. Your pancreas secretes enzymes that aid digestion and hormones that help regulate the metabolism of carbohydrates.

spreads rapidly and is seldom detected in its stages, which is a major reason why it’s a leading cause of death. Signs and symptoms may not appear until the disease is quite advanced. By that time, the is likely to have spread to other parts of the body and surgical removal is no longer possible.

For years, little was known about . But researchers are beginning to understand the genetic basis of the disease — knowledge that may eventually lead to new and better . Just as important, you may be able to reduce your risk of with some lifestyle changes.

Tags:

Related posts

Posted in Cancer | Comment